NASA Logo, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Current and recent projects

In a modern world, importance of computer modeling for solving complex engineering problems cannot be overstated. However, in many cases environments are too complex, temporal and spatial scales are too diverse, and the nature of the physics processes are too complicated to provide a unique answer. Therefore, further physical and analytical insight is required to guide computer simulations. To address the complexity of the physical process at the interface of multiple engineering systems, a new discipline is emerging: physics based methods for the analysis of integrated vehicle environment. This discipline combines "old-fashioned" analytical physics based approach to modeling engineering problems with modern advanced technologies for analyzing continuous and discrete information flow involving multiple modes of operation in uncertain environments, unknown state variables, heterogeneous software and hardware components. Conceptually, critical physics analysis begins when observed effects cannot be understood within the scope of existing models, or when there is an unexplained discrepancy between the computer model predictions and experimental data, when root causes of system failure need to be understood, when a puzzle emerges from the nontrivial interplay between seemingly distant physics disciplines, when the vehicle performance is studied outside of nominal operational margins or the overly conservative margins and knockdown factors need to be improved. Critical physics analysis plays a major role in situations where substantially different environments, mission durations, operational modes, states and constraints exist that we do not yet understand with our existing experience. Best results can often be achieved by combining simplified physics-based models developed with theoretical methods and critical physics insight that helps to discern, qualify, and quantify key phenomena and causality relations within complex environments provided by computer simulations. This is, in turn, achieved through an interdisciplinary effort that combines computer simulations and physics analysis with laboratory and field experiments, mathematical modeling, optimization algorithms and data-driven techniques.

This approach is especially important in the era of limited funds, where we must optimize all science, technology, and risk reduction investments for development projects. Many problems that we face are integrated in nature, interrelated in solution, and interdependent in application. We should look for a way to prioritize, focus, and “solve the right problem.” There exists a deep interrelation between the physics-based approaches and Integrated System Health Management, diagnostics and prognostics. The objective of critical physics analysis here is to confine the space of designs, level of automation and fault management strategies to obey the set of constraints driven by the operational physics and to inform about possible increase in failure probability. It is also to develop physics of failure models predicting system degradation in exploitation cycles and due to environment. Development of leading-order physics models is also a necessity in Engineering Risk Assessment to capture the main cause-and-effect sequences and to perform sensitivity studies via quantitative models and explicit analysis of the physics-based interactions and mechanisms that drive operational risks. Overall, there is a significant and growing need in development of deep insights and simplified models to capture the nature of complex phenomena in operational-mission environments. At the same time, critical analysis based on fundamental physics investigations still remains a somewhat rare commodity in NASA experience---a “work of art”---that has been largely lost from NASA since the 1960s and 70s.

Members

Group Lead

Dogan Timucin

Engineering Physics team

Halyna Hafiychuk
Vasyl Hafiychuk
Michael Khasin
Dmitry Luchinsky
Stefan Schuet
Kevin Wheeler

Quantum Physics team

Marcello Benedetti
Zhang Jiang
Kostyantyn Kechedzhi
Sergey Knysh
Salvatore Mandrà
Bryan O'Gorman
Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz
Andre Petukhov
John Realpe-Gomez
Eleanor Rieffel
Fedir Vasko
Davide Venturelli
Zhihui Wang

Collaborators

NASA

Ioana Cozmuta (ARC BP)
Cetin Kiris (ARC TN)
John Lawson (ARC TS)
Harry Partridge (ARC D)

Eric Burke (LaRC)
Chris Lang (LaRC)
Cara Leckey (LaRC)
Dan Perey (LaRC)
Steve Smith (LaRC)
Terryl Wallace (LaRC)
Joe Zalameda (LaRC)

Stacey Bagg (MSFC)
Quincy Bean (MSFC)
Ken Cooper (MSFC)
John Vickers (MSFC)
James Walker (MSFC)
Michael Watson (MSFC)
Niki Werkheiser (MSFC)

External

Shawn Beard (Acellent Technologies)
Fu-Kuo Chang (Stanford University)
Michael Foygel (consultant)
Seth Kessler (Metis Design)
Cyrill Muratov (NJIT)
Viatcheslav Osipov (consultant)

First Gov logo
NASA Logo - nasa.gov